Quality And Management

Quality and Management Structure is an integrated management system that ensures the planning, monitoring, evaluation, and continuous improvement of educational activities within the scope of the Construction Technology Program in accordance with quality assurance principles.

This structure is based on stakeholder participation, data-driven evaluation, transparent decision-making processes, and a continuous improvement approach. All processes are carried out in line with the university’s quality assurance system.

The quality management process of the program is structured under the following headings:

Advisory Board Process

The Advisory Board is a structure formed with the participation of internal and external stakeholders. In this board, opinions and suggestions regarding the development of the program are evaluated and systematically collected.

At the end of the meetings, an Advisory Board Report is prepared. This report identifies the strengths of the program and the areas that need improvement.

The recommendations obtained are evaluated at the departmental level, and appropriate items are submitted to senior management through a Department Board decision and included in improvement processes.

Student Advising Process

Within the scope of Student Advising, regular meetings are held. Before these meetings, class representatives collect students’ opinions and suggestions and contribute to the process.

The collected feedback is evaluated during the meetings, and a Student Advising Report is prepared. This report identifies students’ needs regarding academic and administrative processes.

The prepared report is submitted to senior management through a Department Board decision and included in improvement activities.

Survey Processes

Within the program, various surveys are conducted regularly to collect feedback from students, graduates, and employers:

• Course and Instructor Evaluation Survey
• Employer Internship/Practical Training Evaluation Survey
• Student Internship/Practical Training Evaluation Survey
• New Graduate Program Evaluation Survey
• Graduate Survey
• Employer Survey for Graduate Employees

Survey results are analyzed and reported. If the average score falls below the defined threshold value of 3.10, the relevant area is considered a “development area” and an action plan is developed.

Prepared survey reports are submitted to senior management through a Department Board decision and included in quality improvement processes.

Course Reports Process

At the end of each semester, course evaluation reports are prepared for each course. These reports include course delivery, student achievement status, assessment and evaluation results, and student feedback.

In course reports, course learning outcomes (CLOs), program outcomes (POs), exam success rates, and survey results are analyzed to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Accordingly, improvement actions and plans are developed.

All course reports are consolidated into a Program Evaluation Report. This report is submitted to senior management through a Department Board decision and included in the quality assurance and continuous improvement process.