The Program Outcomes (POs) of the Construction Technology Program define the knowledge, skills, and competencies that students are expected to acquire upon graduation. These outcomes have been determined in line with the national qualifications framework, the needs of the construction sector, and stakeholder feedback. The program outcomes are structured in accordance with the criteria of the Council of Higher Education Quality Board.
- PO1: Has sufficient background in basic mathematics, natural sciences, and fundamental technical subjects, and is able to use both theoretical and practical knowledge in solving problems related to the profession. Has the ability to identify, define, formulate, and solve problems related to construction technology and to select appropriate methods and techniques for this purpose.
- PO2: Is able to use basic computer applications as well as software and hardware required by the profession.
- PO3: Has awareness of the necessity of lifelong learning.
- PO4: Has the ability to access information, conduct research, and effectively use information resources.
- PO5: Possesses effective communication skills to accurately convey and manage information both verbally and in writing with all stakeholders within the organization.
- PO6: Develops concrete and creative solutions to problems related to the field.
- PO7: Defines the basic grammar rules of Turkish and a foreign language and acquires basic English language skills.
- PO8: Is able to express thoughts related to the field both verbally and in writing at the level of acquired knowledge and skills.
Determination and Updating of Program Outcomes
The participation of internal and external stakeholders is ensured in the process of determining and updating program outcomes. Feedback obtained from student advising meetings is documented and brought to the agenda of the departmental advisory board.
Advisory board meetings are held with the participation of internal and external stakeholders, and opinions and suggestions regarding program outcomes are systematically evaluated. Appropriate recommendations are included in advisory board reports, and necessary updates are made in line with departmental board decisions.
Last updated: 26 October 2026